The idea of groups is the plan actually. [Sigh. All right, he's new. He missed the memo. Might as well spell it out now. All the while a bit annoyed. She feels like she's stated this one hundred times already.]
For now we need to begin getting to know one another so that these groups can even be made, let alone a leader be chosen. The original idea is to create groups fitting for certain clarifications, as you've said. If need be, someone who is incapable of defending themselves can also be put into these groups, within reason. After three meetings, should that be enough, we'll begin deciding these leaders and organizing these groups. If all actually goes well these groups will be able to train together and the like and collaborate with others. A common leader is ideal but choosing one is the problem. So if we choose any sooner than our 3rd meeting I'm sure no one will be well acquainted enough for a proper decision and any later and we could have even more blood on our hands. When we decide it will be by nomination and vote, three nominations for one person in order to be considered. They'll hold that position for a month and if the 4th meeting comes and the decision of leaders was found to be a poor one by the majority, we'll reconsider and redo a vote if necessary. Hopefully by then, however, these meetings will merely be a collaboration of all groups for strategy and not just a simple chat.
no subject
For now we need to begin getting to know one another so that these groups can even be made, let alone a leader be chosen. The original idea is to create groups fitting for certain clarifications, as you've said. If need be, someone who is incapable of defending themselves can also be put into these groups, within reason. After three meetings, should that be enough, we'll begin deciding these leaders and organizing these groups. If all actually goes well these groups will be able to train together and the like and collaborate with others. A common leader is ideal but choosing one is the problem. So if we choose any sooner than our 3rd meeting I'm sure no one will be well acquainted enough for a proper decision and any later and we could have even more blood on our hands. When we decide it will be by nomination and vote, three nominations for one person in order to be considered. They'll hold that position for a month and if the 4th meeting comes and the decision of leaders was found to be a poor one by the majority, we'll reconsider and redo a vote if necessary. Hopefully by then, however, these meetings will merely be a collaboration of all groups for strategy and not just a simple chat.
Does that cover everything for you?